“Your Two Cents” is the new interactive feature where we gauge the opinions of our Twitter and Facebook followers on different discussions in women’s wrestling.
This week, we’re asking this: Do you think TNA’s Knockouts Tag Titles are necessary, what with the lack of competition for them? We’ve read your responses on our social media pages and picked some of the best submissions to highlight here on the website. As always, you can join the debate by leaving your comments!
Our Two Cents
Batting for Team DD this week, it’s Cryssi giving us her personal opinion on this week’s topic:
Cryssi | Personally, I’ve always thought the tag team titles were pointless. TNA has no problem finding storylines for all their girls, and none of them have ever really revolved around the belts in question. There’s never really been anything done with them from what I can recall. All they’ve been used for is to give people who wouldn’t normally hold a title a chance to be champion, like Rosita and Brooke for example. I’m not for or against that, but when you take a title away from someone who is doing a good job as champ and give it to someone upon their return who is already over, then I have a problem. The tag titles are useless and seeing as how Gail and Madison will probably hold them for the next hundred years, they’re even more pointless. Probably best to just get rid of them.
Your Two Cents
 |
@bdlou | Those tag belts are a curse. When they stay on people too long, they usually get released. |
 |
Charlie Flickinger | I say do away with them, but do away with them in a meaningful, entertaining way. After Gail and Mickie finish feuding have Karen declare that she is doing away the Knockouts Tag Team titles and unifying the three titles. Have Karen tell Madison to lay down for Gail and then at the PPV Madison does. This cements everyone as a heel and lead into a feud with whoever finds this the most offensive. |
|
David Damphousse | Is there better competition in the male division? Both WWE and TNA should stick with women tag teams. They increase rivalries, and in both WWE and TNA, these tag teams will help produce legit, valid storylines for ALL wrestlers. |
|
Jhonmarco Velazquez | The fact that I can’t remember a decent tag title reign should say it all. The titles are just accessories at this point, I heard many people say with Gail being a tag champ they’d matter again but they still don’t! Tbh TNA never had enough teams to justify a women’s tag division. The only tag title matches I remember enjoying are TNT vs. Sarita & Rosita and Saritaylor vs. Kong & Hamada (epic match). They should just get rid of the titles, they’re really only just there. |
|
Kelvin P. Long | The problem isn’t the talent, it is time. TNA only has one show. WWE has 4 including NXT. With that said, WWE doesn’t do a good job with its Tag Team mens Championship, even with 4 shows. Kind of stupid, I remember those Tag Team Championships meant something. |
|
Zak Burke | The next random team wins the belts, holds them for 3 months, then lose them to the next random team. If they would recreate some quality match like Wilde and Sarita vs Hamada and Kong. It sucks considering the fact they have 14 Knockouts. |
And now we turn it over to you…
What are your two cents on the debate? Do the Knockouts Tag Team Titles have a purpose in TNA? Tell us in the comments…
